The Royal Society Winton Prize for Science Books and Inept Guardian Competiton Question

The Royal Society Winton Prize for Science Books winner will be announced on the 26th November. The shortlist is:

The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos by Brian Greene; Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everythingby Joshua Foer; My Beautiful Genome by Lone Frank; The Informationby James Gleick; The Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven Pinker; The Viral Storm by Nathan Wolfe. The only one I’ve read of these is the Steven Pinker, and very good it was as well – as was the talk he gave at the Royal Institution.

I was interested to see that The Guardian is running a competition to win the whole shortlist. I was going to enter, but unfortunately one of the questions is

Guardian

(Added 27 Nov): I contacted the Guardian this morning and was impressed by the speed of their reply (unless it’s because they were twiddling their thumbs in a state of ennui at the time). The reason for this question is: it’s a joke about bad science. So now the Guardian writer who replied to my email obviously thinks I have no sense of humour, and although I’ll admit I’m surprised it’s a joke, I would suggest that it’s not funny (at all, really, but definitely not in the context), in part because the answer which is supposed to be right isn’t actually correct either, as ‘food which contains no chemicals’ is no food at all.

I think the reason it’s not obviously a joke is also because scientific knowledge among journalists, both print and broadcast, is awfully lacking. The other day I heard the tail of a feature on a news programme on Radio 4 about lunar cycles, and the interviewer asked the interviewee (apparently in all seriousness), something like ‘so that stuff about werewolves, there’s nothing in it?’ She didn’t sound like she was joking, and the subject of the interview answered in all seriousness, but then again, maybe she was. And the majority of the presenters of news programmes on Radio 4 people seem to be mildly proud of their inability to understand pretty basic scientific principles.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in books, science and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Royal Society Winton Prize for Science Books and Inept Guardian Competiton Question

  1. Juxtabook says:

    My word that Guardian stunt is witless. It also is not funny – which is surely a key part of a ‘joke’!

    • Nigel Smith says:

      I replied to their reply suggesting it wasn’t funny, which was why I didn’t get the joke, but they never replied. Now the competition deadline is past, the page just says ‘this competition is now closed’, nothing about ‘but it was a joke really’. So no punch line!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s